The number of wineries in the United States continues to grow, reports Wine Business Monthly. The total at the end of November was 6,223, up 122 over the past year. That equals the 6% growth pace of 2008 and shows some resilience in the wine industry despite the bad economy. To be sure, the “launch” decisions for many of these new wineries were probably made in better times, and the growth was much more modest than the explosive 10% in 2007 and 15% in 2006. But still, we need to drink even in hard times, right?
“We had explosive growth in past years; but if wineries grow 5 percent a year, that’s still pretty good growth,” Bill Nelson, president of the U.S. wine trade association WineAmerica, told WBM. “These are still big numbers. At 5 percent a year, the number of wineries doubles in 15 years.”
While I and other bloggers and writers have trumpeted the rise of “regional wines,” the magazine reported that California continues to have about half of the nation’s wineries, a figure that has remained steady over the past four years. California has 3,047 wineries, followed not so closely by Washington state with 564, Oregon with 453, New York with 229, Virginia with 163, Texas with 157, Pennsylvania with 141, Ohio with 120, Michigan at 104 and North Carolina at 101.
The WBM article did not give last year’s rankings, but Virginia’s growth has been phenomenal in 2009 and I’d wager the Old Dominion overtook the Lone Star state last year. These rankings overall show the vitality of the wine industry in the Eastern United States.
I think you missed one of the important points about the study that augers well for regional wine, Dave. It's that 10 states -- 7 of which aren't California, Washington and Oregon -- have more than 100 wineries. Also, from what I know of the numbers, the regional figures in the study are almost certainly not up to date. Texas' wine trade group reports almost 200 wineries as of January 2010, and I'm sure the other top regional states are equally under reported.
Posted by: Jeff Siegel | January 19, 2010 at 07:46 AM
That would indeed be explosive growth for Texas in the last six weeks! :-)
Posted by: Dave McIntyre | January 19, 2010 at 08:16 AM
Dave, I'm wondering if you're aware of the methods that Wine Business Monthly uses in tracking the number of wineries. The obvious part would be to annually collect the lists of bonded wineries from each state. But one has to assume that, while a person/company needs to apply for a bond to make and sell wine in a given state, it's not likely any action is taken to remove the listing when a winery goes out of business. In short, I'm wondering how and if they can get information on the wineries that go under, as one would logically assume there was really a net subtraction over the past year or two.
Posted by: Allen Clark | January 19, 2010 at 09:03 AM